All Lives Matter. by Dean Gotcher

All Lives Matter.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

You can not see your hate of restraint as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain it, keep it, or get it back.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

It is not a race issue. It is a sin issue. Hate is not delegated to a particulate skin color. It is an issue of the heart (all are guilty). When you make hate a race issue, class warfare, i.e., Marxism ensues (hate prevails).

"For one class to stand for the whole of society, another must be the class of universal offense and the embodiment of universal limits. A particular social sphere must stand for the notorious crime of the whole society, so that liberation from this sphere appears to be universal liberation. For one class to be the class par excellence of liberation, another class must, on the other hand, be openly the subjugating class." "The only practically possible emancipation is the unique theory which holds that man is the supreme being for man." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words, according to Karl Marx, et al., "Lust reconciles us to the world." Anyone who stands in the way of "lust," i.e., of "self interest" therefore becomes the enemy of "the people," i.e., the enemy of the Marxist. Money (capital) comes in here in that when the father/Father controls the money (capital), tying it to right and wrong behavior, the children must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" and in order (as in "old" world order) to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to have access to it, establishing a "top-down," "Mine. Not yours," "above-below," "right-wrong," i.e., private convictions, private property, private business authority system. When the father's/Father's authority is removed from the equation then those who are "helping" the children 'liberate' their "self" from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "helping" the children negate the father's/Father's authority in their thoughts and actions are able to control of the capital, using the children as "human resource" for their own pleasure and gain, i.e., their own "lusts," i.e., their own "self interests," doing what they want, when they want, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting," casting anyone (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous) away when they no longer give them pleasure and/or get (or have the potential of getting) in their way.

In class warfare the carnal nature of the child, i.e., man (the revolutionary) "lusting" after the carnal pleasures (dopamine emancipation) of the moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., only that which "is of the world" supersedes (and therefore negates) the Father's authority, i.e., negates you having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. When it comes to right and wrong behavior, by replacing discussion, i.e., the father's/Father's authority (that which is formal)—where you have to suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' in order to hear and receive the truth—with dialogue, i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' which the world (the situation) is stimulating (that which is informal)—where you and the other person have to suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of dialogue, i.e., that gets in the way of your and their carnal desires, i.e., your and their "self interests," i.e., your and their "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world (the situation) is stimulating—the father's/Father's authority is negated.

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Discussion is indicative of the father's/Father's authority, subject to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—deductive reasoning is reasoning from and through established commands, rules, facts, and truth (a priories).

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (ibid.) Dialogue is indicative of the child's carnal nature, loving pleasure and hating restraint, resenting (excluding) any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of his carnal desires of the 'moment,' something that we have in common with one another—inductive reasoning is 'reasoning' from and through "appropriate information," i.e., selecting, recognizing, and supporting (affirming) only that information that 'justifies' (guarantees) a person's "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires of the 'moment' and his perception of the situation, rejecting "inappropriate information," i.e., information (any established command, rule, fact, or truth) that gets in the way of his desired outcome.

Sounding more like Karl Marx, than Karl Marx himself (who was not yet born), Georg Hegel wrote of the effect dialogue (informal) would have upon the family, i.e., the father's authority (formal), 'changing' it and therefore the nation and the world:

"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child, where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [no "top-down" order], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

Crisis resolved through discussion initiates and sustains the father's/Father's authority, preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking 'change.' Crisis resolved through dialogue on the other hand negates the father's/Father's authority, i.e., initiates and sustains 'change.' By focusing upon "self interest," i.e., "lust," i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the peoples" love of pleasure and hate of restraint instead of upon doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., upon doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., "rule of law," dialogue, i.e., "self interest," i.e., "lust," i.e., anarchy and revolution, i.e., 'change' prevails over and therefore against restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority. By making "feelings," i.e., the child's "lust" for the things of the world the thesis, instead of doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts and truth—making the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law" the antithesis—'change,' i.e., anarchy and revolution, i.e., the children, through dialogue united as one (in consensus—synthesis) in negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., in negating "rule of law" is initiated and sustained.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

The following is inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb. It is the basis of 'change,' i.e., anarchy and revolution, i.e., the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the negation of "rule of law," replacing it with "lawfulness without law" where the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature" rules without the father's/Father's authority, i.e., without "obedience to laws," i.e., without restraint getting in the way, where the child's carnal nature is 'justified' over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment).

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb.

All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once the father's/Father's authority is no longer in their way. The problem, according to Karl Marx, et, al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, i.e., preventing them from being (becoming) their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.' Without creating a world of dialogue, the child, out of fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out, privately dialoguing within (with) his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint, will remain forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough, by his "self' to overthrow the father/Father and his/His authority system

"Never let a crisis go to waste."

That is why Marxists use crisis, i.e., violent rhetoric and action (fear) to pressure leadership into dialogue, getting leadership to abdicate, i.e., negate its authority to tyranny in the process. Marxists do not stop violence, i.e., crime. They use violence, i.e., crime to drive leadership into their snare.

"For to accept that solution [where all must participate in dialogue, i.e., participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, i.e., participate in being "positive," i.e., supportive of the child's carnal nature, 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world (the situation) is stimulating, before one another and "not negative," i.e., supportive of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth], even in theory, would be tantamount to observing society from a class standpoint [from the child's perspective, i.e., from their carnal nature, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment' which the world (the situation) is stimulating] other than that of the bourgeoisie [from the father's/Father's authority]. And no class can do that-unless it is willing to abdicate its power freely." "As soon as the bourgeoisie [the parent] is forced to take up its stand on this terrain [abdicates his authority, in order (as in "new" world order) to dialogue with the child, i.e., to become "equal" with the child], it is lost." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only. "Building relationship upon common self interests," i.e., upon "human nature," i.e., upon "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., only that which "is of the world," turns the children/mankind against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., against parental/Godly restraint.

"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (Lukács)

When you makes law subject to "human nature," i.e., to "self interest," i.e., to "lust" those making law (and interpreting it) end up making law subject to their "self interests," i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' making "jurisprudence" unpredictable.

"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law)

In that case only the law of 'change,' i.e., anarchy and revolution rules, 'justifying' the negation (silencing and/or removing) of anyone who gets in the way. By redefining law, making it subject to common "self interests" (common-ism), i.e., to "lust," i.e., to the child's carnal nature instead of doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., "rule of law" (which carries with it restraint, even for those in government) the individual's rights (under God) are negated, making him subject to those in power who are "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, doing what they want, when they want, removing (negating) anyone who gets in their way (without having a guilty conscience).

"'The ideological history of the bourgeoisie [insisting upon the parent's, i.e., the father's authority in the home] was nothing but a desperate resistance to every insight into the true nature of the society it had created [their children's, i.e., the proletariat's "felt needs" to become their "self," thinking and acting according to their carnal nature—the bourgeoisie, according to Karl Mars, are parents, who (when they were children 'created' an "alien and hostile force" by obeying their parent's commands and rules as given and accepting their facts and truth as is, by faith) insist that their children obey their commands and rules as given and accept their facts and truth as is, by faith] and thus to a real understanding of its class situation [its "creation" of a "top-down," "right-wrong," "Do what I say or else" ("Because I said so," "It is written") authority system over their children, "repressing" their children (getting in the way of their carnal nature), "alienating" them from one another and the world (preventing them from building relationship with other children with the same "self interests," i.e., "lusts"]." "The Communist Manifesto makes the point that the bourgeoisie [the traditional family structure, i.e., the "middle-class"] produces its own grave-diggers [children who hate their parent's authority].'" (Lukács)

This was Lenin's concern.

A "more powerful enemy, the bourgeoisie [the middle class-traditional family, with the father's authority over the family, a top-down system of government], whose resistance … and whose power lies ... in the force of habit, in the strength of small-scale production." "Unfortunately, small-scale production is still widespread in the world, and small-scale production engenders capitalism and the bourgeoisie continuously, daily, hourly, spontaneously, and on a mass scale." "... the peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "... gigantic problems of re-educating ..." "... eradicating their bourgeois habits and traditions...." "... until small-scale economy and small commodity production have entirely disappeared, the bourgeois atmosphere, proprietary habits and petty-bourgeois traditions will hamper proletarian work both outside and within the working-class movement, …" "... in every field of social activity, in all cultural and political spheres without exception." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs and traditions everywhere." "... capitalism and the bourgeois environment … disappears very slowly even after the overthrow of the bourgeoisie, since the peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie give rise to what is essentially the same bourgeois careerism, national chauvinism, petty-bourgeois vulgarity, etc. —merely varying insignificantly in form—in positively every sphere of activity and life." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success)

George Washington warned us about the heart of man, i.e., about man making law according to his "self interests," i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (the situation) is stimulating.

"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them."

"If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield." (George Washington Farewell Speech)

All lives matter. Equality under the law, i.e., "rule of law" requires that all (including leadership) recognize they are accountable for their thoughts and actions before God. When the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature," i.e. "lust," i.e., "self interest," i.e., "What can I get out of this (situation/person) for my 'self?'" becomes the standard for life, i.e., for making law then tyranny, anarchy, and revolution reigns, i.e., the people are oppressed.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12